tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-547897939952002643.post5197307722442730744..comments2023-07-12T05:11:28.374-07:00Comments on 2Cheap2Meter: Refusal recommended for Cippenham windfarmTobyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04371727827421776831noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-547897939952002643.post-67663436425489609782008-10-23T09:35:00.000-07:002008-10-23T09:35:00.000-07:00Hi there,what facts am I missing? As I see it, the...Hi there,<BR/><BR/>what facts am I missing? As I see it, the officers report rightly detailed lots of the *local* issues, such as noise, shadow-flicker and generally looming, but didn't take into account the wider issues, such as climate change, fuel scarcity, fuel poverty - the list goes on. Many of the arguments put forward by WindRats and repeated by some of the councillors just don't hold water.<BR/><BR/><BR/>I don't work for an energy supplier, alas (except for the solar panel on the roof of my van), but I do live nearby the turbine site. I think that the plan was wrong for the particular site, but right for the town. On the other side of the motorway would be much better.<BR/><BR/>You're right about having houses use less energy, though I would say it's *people* that use energy, not houses. There's no point generating electricity just to waste it ...Tobyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04371727827421776831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-547897939952002643.post-41889601690766582412008-10-23T08:26:00.000-07:002008-10-23T08:26:00.000-07:00Sorry I think you have got it all wrong. You obvio...Sorry I think you have got it all wrong. You obviously dont live near this proposed turbine and don't no all the facts. You could build houses that require less energy in the first place but these cost money like turbines with no income generation. Perhaps you work for an energy supplier?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17391471467346561066noreply@blogger.com